GE Rongfeng,WANG Jingjing,CHI Yanyan,et al.Ecological Spatial Recognition and Construction of Ecological Security Pattern in Beijing New Airport Economic Zone[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Information Technology,2022,37(02):215-220.[doi:10.16836/j.cnki.jcuit.2022.02.016]
北京新机场临空经济区生态空间识别与生态安全格局构建
- Title:
- Ecological Spatial Recognition and Construction of Ecological Security Pattern in Beijing New Airport Economic Zone
- 文章编号:
- 2096-1618(2022)02-0215-06
- Keywords:
- ecological space; control unit; ecological security pattern planning; ecosystem services function
- 分类号:
- X013
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 有效识别生态空间与构建生态安全格局是实现城市或区域可持续发展与生态保护的重要途径。以雄安新区周边区域—北京新机场临空经济区为研究对象,识别重要性生态空间,获取关键性生态空间,衔接生态保护红线划定工作,综合叠加需严格保护的各类保护地,确定生态空间。结果显示,北京新机场临空经济区生态空间面积约278.7 km2,占区域面积约7.7%。借鉴生态安全格局规划理论,结合环首都国家公园体系和区域生态廊道建设要求,识别各类保护地和集聚分布的生态斑块为生态“源”区、重要道路及河流水系等为生态“廊道”,提出“一轴、四廊、多源”的区域生态安全格局构建方案。
- Abstract:
- Effective identification of ecological space and construction of ecological security pattern are important ways to achieve sustainable urban development and ecology protection. In this study, Beijing New Airport Economic Zone is taken as the research object to identify the important ecological space and obtain the key ecological space. Connecting with the delimitation of the red line of ecological protection, we should synthetically superimpose all kinds of protected areas that need strict protection and determine the ecological space. The results show that the ecological space area of Beijing New Airport Economic Zone is 278.7 km2,accounting for about 7.7% of the regional area.Drawing lessons from the theory of ecological security pattern planning and combining with the construction requirements of the national park system and regional ecological corridors around the capital, the ecological patches of various protected areas and agglomeration distribution are identified as ecological “source” areas, and important roads and river systems are identified as ecological“corridors”.And the regional ecological security pattern construction scheme of “one axis, four corridors and multiple sources”is put forward.
参考文献/References:
[1] Li C,Zheng H,Li S,et al.Impacts of conservation and human development policy across stakeholders and scales[J].PNAS,2015,112(24):7396-7401.
[2] 迟妍妍,许开鹏,王晶晶,等.新型城镇化时期京津冀地区生态环境分区管控框架[J].环境保护,2015,43(23):63-65.
[3] 许开鹏,步秀芹,曾广庆,等.环境功能区划的空间尺度特征[J].城乡规划,2017(5):82-89.
[4] 许开鹏,迟妍妍,陆军,等.环境功能区划进展与展望[J].环境保护,2017,45(1):53-57.
[5] 常美玉,向卫国.川西地区空气污染特征及气象影响因素分析[J].成都信息工程大学学报,2019,34(1):92-99.
[6] 赵海君,包存宽,马蔚纯,等.基于协同推进生态文明建设的“多评融合”路径初探[J].中国环境管理,2016,8(1):61-67.
[7] 欧阳志云.开创复合生态系统生态学,奠基生态文明建设——纪念著名生态学家王如松院士诞辰七十周年[J].生态学报,2017,37(17):5579-5583.
[8] 郭小莹,肖天贵.川东北地区滑坡易发性区划及气象预警模型研究[J].成都信息工程大学学报,2019,34(6):625-631.
[9] Ouyang Z Y,Zheng H,Xiao Y,et al.Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital.Science.2016,352:1455-1459.
[10] Bai Y,Jing B,Wang M,et al.New ecological redline policy(ERP)to secure ecosystem services in China[J]. Land Use Policy,2016,55:348-351.
[11] 马程,王晓玥,张雅昕,等.北京市生态涵养区生态系统服务供给与流动的能值分析[J].地理学报,2017,72(6):974-985.
[12] 肖强,肖洋,欧阳志云,等.重庆市森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].生态学报,2014,34(1):216-223.
[13] 王金南,许开鹏,蒋洪强,等.基于生态环境资源红线的京津冀生态环境共同体发展路径[J].环境保护,2015,43(23):22-25.
[14] Raum S.A framework for integrating systematicstakeholder analysis in ecosystem services research: Stakeholder mapping for forest ecosystem services in the UK[J].Ecosystem Services,2018,29:170-184.
[15] 肖强,陶建平,肖洋,等.黄土高原近10年植被覆盖的动态变化及驱动力[J].生态学报,2016,36(23):7594-7602.
[16] 于丹丹,吕楠,傅伯杰.生物多样性与生态系统服务评估指标与方法[J].生态学报,2017,37(2):349-357.
[17] 王晶晶,许开鹏,迟妍妍,等.西藏自治区生态环境空间管控框架研究[J].环境保护,2018,46(16):62-65.
[18] 王万鑫,范广洲.基于生态地理分区的青藏高原NDVI变化特征研究[J].成都信息工程大学学报,2020,35(3):306-312.
[19] 傅伯杰,于丹丹,吕楠.中国生物多样性与生态系统服务评估指标体系[J].生态学报,2017,37(2):341-348.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-02-16
基金项目:国家重点研发计划资助项目(2018YFC0506901)